The noble Lord has given us the assurance that we need on the independence of the commissioner, and I am perfectly content to withdraw Amendment No. 1 and not to press Amendment No. 2. He has also asserted the importance of the independence of the commissioner with regard to staffing, the point covered by Amendment No. 9. I am sure that the noble Lord shares our concern about the tendency towards increased bureaucracy; we would not wish, as I do not think he would, to see an undue and exceptional high level of bureaucracy invading the office of the commissioner for the elderly in Wales. Having made that point, which I am sure will be looked at by the Assembly on an annual basis and before the commissioner starts his work and is in the process of engaging staff, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
[Amendment No. 2 not moved.]
Commissioner for Older People (Wales) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Roberts of Conwy
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 18 October 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Commissioner for Older People (Wales) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c184-5GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:15:01 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280554
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280554
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280554