moved Amendment No. 75:"Page 9, line 4, leave out ““previously”” and insert ““immediately before the relevant date””"
The noble Duke said: I am concerned that the word ““previously”” is non-specific. Would the Government support the registration of rights of common that had been extinguished by common law through alteration to the dominant tenement or even the reinstatement of rights which had not been in use for a number of years? If the Government cannot accept the amendment because they propose to allow reinstatement, we believe their intention should be expressed on the face of the Bill by some form of words qualifying or replacing the word ““previously””. I beg to move.
Commons Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Duke of Montrose
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 1 November 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Commons Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c34GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:44:03 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280310
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280310
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280310