moved Amendment No. 63:"Page 8, line 6, leave out subsection (6) and insert—"
““(6) The interests of right holders must take priority where exchange takes place.
(6A) Where the exchange of contiguous land to existing common land is deregistered the interests of common right holders will be a primary consideration.
(6B) In determining the application, the appropriate national authority shall also have regard to—
(a) the interests of the neighbourhood;
(b) the public interest;
(c) any other matter considered to be relevant.””
The noble Lord said: In moving Amendment No. 63, I shall speak also to Amendment No. 69. The amendment states unequivocally that:"““The interests of right holders must take priority””,"
because deregistration or exchange could seriously disadvantage common right holders and even cause a sheep enterprise to become uneconomic, for example. Subsection (6A) would ensure that in deregistration and subsection (6B) contains the original paragraphs (a), (b) and (c).
Amendment No. 69 is a consequential amendment as a result of Amendment No. 63 because there would be three paragraphs instead of the original four. I beg to move.
Commons Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Livsey of Talgarth
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 1 November 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Commons Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c20GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:08:48 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280289
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280289
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280289