Would I be right in saying that, if the owner of the land in question had given rights to people to conduct such activities in written form on a legal basis over 20 years, that would not necessarily result in the achievement of a prescriptive right? In other words, at certain points throughout the 20-year period, written permission has been given by the landowner, so that, at the end of the period, there would not be a prescriptive right. I have not explained it very well, but I think that the noble Lord knows what I am saying.
Commons Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Earl Peel
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 1 November 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Commons Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c9GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:23:36 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280251
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280251
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_280251