I found the Minister’s answer very helpful and thank him for it. I take on board all that he said about anonymity. My amendment was intended as a hook on which to hang a debate, and the debate has been useful. I endorse what the noble Baroness, Lady Tonge, said. Confidence in the system on the part of patients and the public will depend on perception. The Government seem to be of the view that patients will be content to remain passive recipients of the honesty of the NHS. I am not sure that that is a realistic hope. Patients must believe that their complaint is in the hands of someone who is neutral and unbiased. It is probably appropriate that someone in the trust, such as an executive director, is given that responsibility. It would not necessarily be right to give it to a non-executive director, because they usually do not have the necessary influence to drive through change in the sense that we are discussing—culture change.
Again, we will need to return to the matter later but, for now, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
[Amendment No. 56 not moved.]
On Question, Whether Clause 10 shall stand part of the Bill?
NHS Redress Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Earl Howe
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 23 November 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on NHS Redress Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c411GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:43:30 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279168
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279168
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_279168