Amendments Nos. 36 and 38, as the noble Baroness said, are similarly worded. They would have the effect of placing explicitly in the Bill the need for settlement agreements in respect of a child or incapacitated adult to be subject to the approval of a court of law. The amendments are not necessary because Clause 6(2)(e) enables the scheme to make provision for settlement agreements under the scheme to be subject in cases of a specified description to approval by a court. It is clearly our intention—I assure the Committee—that the scheme will specify that awards made to children and the mentally incapacitated will require approval by the court to ensure that accepting the offer is in the patient’s best interests.
NHS Redress Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Warner
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 21 November 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on NHS Redress Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c384GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:31:21 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_277801
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_277801
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_277801