The Minister said that Amendment No. 174, in the name of my noble friend Lady Byford, was not satisfactory because it would impede the effectiveness of a commons association. What would happen if, through the formation of a commons association, the owner was disenfranchised or disproportionately out of pocket? Presumably, the payment scheme installed by the association would have to take that into account. So it would not necessarily be across the board; it would have to be pro rata according to the losses incurred by each individual party.
Commons Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Earl Peel
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 9 November 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Commons Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c220GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:20:16 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_275953
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_275953
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_275953