Amendment No. 156 is related to Clause 30(3)(f),"““removing livestock unlawfully permitted to graze””."
I want to question the Minister a little further on this. I understand that at the moment it is not possible to remove a pony or horse from a common if the animal does not have a passport. This is a specific situation because all horses have to have passports. However, if an animal finds its way on to a common and does not have a passport, it cannot be removed. The Minister has said that it is normal practice to remove horses and other livestock, very often sheep, which are illegally grazing on a common. Usually an advertisement is placed in a local newspaper and, after 40 days, the animal is sold. But it is now impossible to remove a horse if it does not have a passport.
The only solution we can see is to enable the commons association to obtain a passport for a horse which is grazing illegally so that it can be legally removed and sold after a 40-day period.
Commons Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Livsey of Talgarth
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 9 November 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Commons Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c205GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:20:25 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_275907
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_275907
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_275907