It is excellent to see that Labour Members are interested in practical legislation that can work. I am delighted at my hon. Friend’s suggestion. She will know that we have made some amendments to cover historical re-enactments and museums, and she makes an excellent suggestion in relation to airsoft. Clearly, if imitations are not realistic, they can be used in that fashion.
I may as well be even in my disappointment as between the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives. I was disappointed with the Conservatives in relation to mandatory sentences for people who seek to get others to hide and mind their guns for them. We included a provision that mandatory five-year sentences, such as those for the possession of weapons, would be imposed for seeking to use particularly children to mind illegal guns. Frankly, I was amazed at the Conservatives. The hon. Member for Huntingdon (Mr. Djanogly) said:"““For this crime, it seems inappropriate that the sentence should be mandatory””.—[Official Report, Standing Committee B, 20 October 2005; c. 187.]"
The Opposition must know that, since we introduced the mandatory five-year sentence for being in possession of an illegal gun, people have reduced their usage of real guns and moved to using imitations, which is why we have the provisions on the banning of realistic imitations.
Violent Crime Reduction Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Hazel Blears
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 14 November 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Violent Crime Reduction Bill 2005-06.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
439 c785-6 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 22:10:55 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_274486
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_274486
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_274486