UK Parliament / Open data

Violent Crime Reduction Bill

Proceeding contribution from Sally Keeble (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 14 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bills on Violent Crime Reduction Bill 2005-06.
No, I do not, because some areas have had voluntary charging schemes that have worked fine. However, the problem with a voluntary system is that it cannot be implemented in areas where the licensees are being difficult. I can understand it if hon. Members need more information about charging regimes and regulations, but that is very different from tabling an amendment that would make the proposal unworkable. The proposals would be tough on the industry, but the voluntary schemes have proved that the industry is capable of dealing with them. Some sectors of the industry are also making a large amount of money. The schemes will be tough for some businesses, but they will also be an important weapon for the local authorities and police to have in their arsenal to deal with what has become a real problem. It is a problem not only in the demands it places on the police and local services, but for the viability of certain town centres. The sort of things that go on in Northampton town centre on Friday and Saturday nights every week are also damaging for business. I support the Government’s proposals and I oppose the Liberal Democrats’ amendments because they would make the proposals unworkable.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

439 c751-2 

Session

2005-06

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top