Without wishing to bring this one to an end, we have had a very interesting debate. I said right at the beginning that no one wanted to do anything to permit the award of the maximum number of points to anyone who had really committed an offence that deserved it. My noble friend Lord Lyell summed it up well when he said that when you put a mandatory six points, are we sure that we are not sometimes going to catch the innocent? That is something that this debate has been going around and around. I hope that the Minister will take advice and reflect on the matter. I repeat that no one—certainly on these Benches—wants to stop someone who actually breaks the law and deserves six points getting them. We want to make certain that there be no miscarriages of justice in any way by having the mandatory six points. I repeat that I hope that there can be some reflection on and discussion about our debate for the future. With that, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Clause 22 agreed to.
Road Safety Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hanningfield
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 17 October 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Road Safety Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c621 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-06-21 11:52:43 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_267170
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_267170
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_267170