UK Parliament / Open data

Natural Environment and Rural Communities Bill

I did not say this in my opening remarks, but we entirely understand the Government’s sensible amendment No. 30, and support it. I was interested to listen to the Minister’s supportive remarks about the gist of my proposal in amendment No. 4—although he had some doubts about the precise wording—because the hon. Member for Sheffield, Hillsborough (Ms Angela C. Smith) went out of her way to damn my amendment, and went as far as suggesting that clause 44 already contained a reference to the inspector having to have good reason. Her version of the Bill must be different from mine. I appreciate the Minister’s intention to consider the matter in another place, although it would be better to have done it in this House; ideally, all amendments should come to this place before they go to the other place. That would address part of our concern, but not our fundamental concerns about clause 44 in its entirety. That is what the other amendments, and new clauses 1 and 2, are supposed to deal with, in replacing clause 44. I have developed a considerable respect for the Minister, and he has dealt with the Bill helpfully and sensibly, but his arguments in the last few minutes have been thin, to say the least.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

437 c197 

Session

2005-06

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top