I would be very surprised if my noble friend, when he replies, is able to say that there is any public road in Britain on which a speed of 80 miles an hour is legal. There may be many motorways on which there is an absence of police patrols and people cheerfully speed above 70 miles per hour knowing that they will not get caught—often in the absence of safety cameras to catch them as well. However, it is my understanding that there is no legal limit above 70 mph anywhere and I am sure that my noble friend will make that point.
I oppose this amendment, not because I am in any way anti-motorist, but because, in a Bill that seeks to improve road safety, it would send an extraordinary signal if in an amendment we increased the speed limit. Nobody can argue that it is safer to travel faster. Therefore, we would be accepting that people are at present breaking the law and that that breaking of the law should be condoned. As the noble Earl rightly pointed out, if the speed limit goes up to 80 mph, the law will be broken at 90 mph or above, and that is even more dangerous than what is proposed.
Road Safety Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Faulkner of Worcester
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 July 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Road Safety Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c475 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 12:51:42 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260952
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260952
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260952