Yes. I do not know the nature of the device. If the device is solely related to the information on the positioning of permanent safety cameras, and the GPS system in those terms, it is entirely benign. My noble friend Lord Berkeley wanted that removed from the Bill, but we do not intend to do that. It is a benign form of information that gives everyone information that we want communicated. Devices that send out impulses and detect other forms of police enforcement cameras are our target.
I am not sufficiently acquainted with the car driven by the noble Earl, Lord Ferrers. In any case, we are talking about the principle. The noble Earl was indicating that the device was extremely helpful to him in staying within the law and recognising where the safety cameras were positioned. I was commending him on that.
Road Safety Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 July 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Road Safety Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c458-9 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 12:51:55 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260914
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260914
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260914