Of course, Parliament must have a considerable say in holding the Government to account—that goes without saying. It is not a question of secondary legislation being a bolt-hole but a question of the different timescale. This is primary legislation. We would not expect another Act to take its place in a short time, but secondary legislation allows areas of flexibility on the issues, as public opinion changes. Such points of detail are in secondary legislation not because governments seek to evade their responsibilities but because there is a proper place for detail and a proper place for broad principle. The broad principle is at issue here.
I hope that noble Lords will recognise that we have exercised our minds considerably about the detail. There will be further opportunities for that to be considered at the appropriate time. I reassure my noble friend Lord Howie that the secondary legislation will be subject to the affirmative resolution.
Road Safety Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Davies of Oldham
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 July 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Road Safety Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c449-50 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 12:30:01 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260883
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260883
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260883