Could we think a little bit about secondary legislation? Secondary legislation is a well known hidey-hole for the Government. We debate things during the progress of the Bill, and then secondary legislation comes before us. We are very limited in what we can do with it. We can talk about it. I may be wrong, but I think that we can throw the legislation out—I am not sure whether that has ever happened—but we cannot amend it. Secondary legislation is, if one might put it this way, second-rate. Would it not be better to put such matters into primary legislation? I know that the Government often do that, because governments like to govern, but Parliament should have some say in how they govern.
Road Safety Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Howie of Troon
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 July 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Road Safety Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c449 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 00:10:49 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260882
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260882
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260882