I am about to say almost that. Common sense, as the noble Lord, Lord Hanningfield, implored on us, is about to prevail.
I can understand the noble Lord’s desire to allow the use of flashing lights on pedal cycles, and I share his interest in that area. However, our lawyers have informed us that the finer points of cycle lighting are regulated under secondary legislation, so such an amendment should be handled in a statutory instrument.
However, I hope that the noble Lord, Lord Hanningfield, will be pleased to hear that the department undertook a public consultation exercise to amend the Road Vehicle Lighting Regulations to permit the use of flashing lights on bicycles as part of a package of amendments. The response to that proposal was generally favourable. A statutory instrument to implement it has not yet been brought forward because several other subjects dealt with in the same consultation were more controversial and required further consideration. In response to my noble friend Lord Berkeley, that was the reason for the time lapse.
We now intend to bring forward a statutory instrument amending the lighting regulations—by the end of this month, we hope, and almost certainly by the end of October. I hope that, with that explanation, the noble Lord will withdraw his amendment.
Road Safety Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Crawley
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 July 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Road Safety Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c442-3 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 12:29:49 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260864
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260864
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260864