I am grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken in the debate. It may be convenient to remind the Committee that we have spent 28 minutes discussing a relatively minor point and we do have a lot of material to get through.
I am grateful for the Minister’s clarification of the matter. However, I am not happy with the detail of his response to my Amendment No. 46. It is important to remember that alcohol deadens inhibitions and judgment.
I refer to the words,"““not to function or not to function properly””"
in new Section 34D(12) on page 16.
I believe that those words constitute a loophole. I cannot understand why the Minister cannot improve the drafting of the Bill in that regard. However, in the mean time and subject to the usual caveats, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
[Amendment No. 46 not moved.]
Road Safety Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Earl Attlee
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 July 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Road Safety Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c431-2 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 12:29:20 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260836
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260836
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_260836