I thank the noble Lord and I am sorry that I was not quick enough to see him rising before beginning to speak. As I was trying to explain, we have not yet the seen letter from the Association of Independent Charity Examiners. No doubt, it makes good points and the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, has voiced some of them. I heard what the noble Lord, Lord Phillips, said and it is worth repeating that we are including accepted good practice in advance of the legislation. Some 95 per cent of those charities in that position already conform with this practice and we are trying to ensure wider coverage, for good reasons.
I shall move the amendments, but, as I said during my opening comments, we are open to representations regarding fine tuning. Given the comments of the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson, the independent examiners’ letter may well enable us to focus on any particular problems and so I am grateful to him for that.
On Question, amendment agreed to.
Clause 29 agreed to.
Clause 30 [Annual audit or examination of accounts of charitable companies]:
[Amendment No. 51 not moved.]
Clause 30 agreed to.
Clauses 31 and 32 agreed to.
Charities Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Bassam of Brighton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 12 July 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Charities Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c1060 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 11:33:07 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_258031
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_258031
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_258031