Whichever way, the Australians are doing rather well at the moment, I fear.
We accept that it has been the normal procedure for the charity to be told but we are seeking to make it explicit that the statement has to be made. Reference has been made to the fact that individuals have not always been allowed to comment on reports that affected them and that some factual inaccuracies could have been corrected. It is obviously an issue on which people will wish to comment following today’s debate.
I have some difficulty with the issue of prejudicing criminal investigations. We have not said that this has to be done in advance but within seven days. Once the Charity Commission and the police are probing around it will become fairly apparent that something is going on. I have some difficulty in seeing how what we are suggesting will prejudice those kinds of investigations.
I will take on board the Minister’s points and reflect further on them. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Charities Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 12 July 2005.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Charities Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c1035-6 Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 11:28:59 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_257985
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_257985
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_257985