Perhaps I may press the Minister further, because I am not clear about this. She said that not all countries would wish to join the supplementary fund. Most countries belong to the existing system, which we know is inadequate, because, for example, the major catastrophes in Galicia and so on were paid for only partially from the fund. As we said during our previous debate, only 20 per cent has been paid for from the fund, with the rest having to come from governments and so on.
The Minister said that this country would be protected if something happened that was caused by one of the states which are not part of the fund. I am not sure how that will work. Presumably they have to have certificates of insurance now. The existing fund did not cover the Galician spill so I am not quite certain how we would be protected by non-participating countries if there were an enormous oil spillage such as the one in Spain. Can the Minister clarify the position now or do we need to think further about it? I am not sure how it will all piece together.
Merchant Shipping Pollution Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hanningfield
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 11 July 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Merchant Shipping Pollution Bill [HL] .
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c134GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:48:23 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_257482
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_257482
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_257482