The noble Lord is ignoring precedent altogether. In the past there has been no occasion whatever when we have considered a provision of this kind; that is, where the Government are to be obliged to publish an annual report. Like any other noble Lord, the noble Lord, Lord Hanningfield, has opportunities in which to probe and question the government, and if possible to do so by question and answer—be it by a Written Question or an Oral Question. It would also be possible to initiate a debate. Furthermore, the noble Lord could arrange to see my noble friend. There are innumerable ways in which the issue could be explored and exploited.
It should not be incumbent upon the department to publish an annual report on the issue, which is rather irrelevant. The important thing is that, if circumstances arise that necessitate Parliament being informed, I am sure that my noble friend or whoever is responsible will do that. It is superficial to place on the department an obligation to publish an annual report; it is not desirable in any way.
Merchant Shipping Pollution Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Clinton-Davis
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 11 July 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Merchant Shipping Pollution Bill [HL] .
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c132GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 02:33:36 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_257479
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_257479
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_257479