I support my noble friend’s amendment because the clause has extremely sweeping powers. It is not a simple question of dealing with amendments to the convention by order. Paragraph (b) clearly states that the subsection relates to,"““any international agreement relating to compensation for oil pollution from ships which modifies””"
—that is fine—"““or replaces the whole or any part of, the Liability Convention””,"
and so on. My reading of that is that it, in effect, gives Her Majesty the power to replace primary legislation with secondary legislation.
We need primary legislation to put the convention into place and I entirely accept that ““on the run”” modifications to compensation schemes and so on should be dealt with by Orders in Council, but—
Merchant Shipping Pollution Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Dixon-Smith
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 11 July 2005.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Merchant Shipping Pollution Bill [HL] .
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
673 c125GC Session
2005-06Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-22 01:48:29 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_257463
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_257463
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_257463