UK Parliament / Open data

Racial and Religious Hatred Bill

I recognise that my hon. Friend is trying to improve rather than retard the Bill. However, I put it to him, without wishing to nit-pick, that the unspoken premise of new clause 2 appears to be that there should be no requirement to prove intention because people must simply be assumed to intend the natural consequences of their actions. That is a dangerous working premise. In matters of argument, whether political or religious, the assumption of rationality is rather dangerous.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

436 c606 

Session

2005-06

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top